The strategic move is to collect structured facts before opponents reduce every conversation to "ban EUCs." This section turns the site into a working campaign desk: signatures, incident evidence, bad-law reports, and legal-impact leads.
Add your name to the public-support count for fair EUC regulation, insurance paths, training, registration options, and targeted enforcement instead of blanket bans. Every signer gets a confirmation email with the petition statement and live count.
Add signatureSubmit collisions, near misses, unsafe corridors, misleading headlines, or public records that should shape policy.
Report factsHelp track cities and states that ban EUCs outright, misclassify them, or leave riders with no lawful compliance path.
Add jurisdictionGive city staff and reporters a clean alternative: classify devices, regulate speed/context, require accountability, and preserve safe access.
Open toolkitSignatures save to a private server-side database while the site publicly proves momentum with aggregate counts. New signers receive an automated email with the petition language, supporter ID, current signature count, and update-list confirmation.
Names, emails, location, role, message, consent, and legal-interest flag are saved server-side. Public visitors only see aggregate counts.
Structured records are live for location, device type, injury context, source links, and fact summaries.
City and state restriction records are live for source links, status, and requested changes.
Private legal-impact leads are live and separated from the public petition for attorney review and organizing.
Good policy needs clean facts. Use this for collisions, near misses, unsafe corridors, news links, police/city records, and examples where reckless behavior is being used to justify broad restrictions.
Separate verified details from rumors: date, place, device type, injury context, infrastructure, and whether existing rules were enforced.
The goal is not to excuse dangerous riding. The goal is to show which regulation would have reduced risk without banning responsible riders.
Flag places where EUCs are illegal, misclassified, ignored, overrestricted, or being debated. This creates the target list for public comments, model ordinances, attorney review, and local rider organizing.
Record the jurisdiction, rule status, source link, and the specific change that would make regulation workable.
Every bad rule becomes a potential packet: local facts, less restrictive alternatives, testimony, and direct outreach.
For riders who have been cited, had a device confiscated, lost access, faced an irrational ban, or need a structured record for attorney review. This is organizing infrastructure, not legal advice.
Build a clean fact pattern around who acted, when, under what rule, and what less restrictive option existed.
Deadlines matter. The intake captures agency, court, hearing, or citation dates so the campaign can triage urgency.
Lawyers need facts, records, dates, documents, and witnesses. This turns scattered rider stories into usable leads.
This form submits to the live EUC Rights Alliance advocate database, adds signers to the campaign update list, and sends an automated confirmation email with the petition statement, supporter ID, current public count, and proof/status links.
I support fair electric unicycle regulation that protects pedestrians, punishes reckless riding, enables insurance/training/registration pathways, and rejects blanket bans against responsible riders.
Riders affected by bans, citations, confiscations, insurance gaps, or state/local classification problems can flag interest in legal review.
Collect signatures, document incidents, organize testimony, give attorneys clean facts, and show policymakers that safety and rider access can exist in the same rulebook.