EUC Rights Alliance Sign the petition

San Francisco: Repair Trust Without Erasing EUCs

San Francisco is the proving ground. If the EUC community cannot answer pedestrian-safety concerns here, the argument will be written by fear, injury headlines, and people who think “ban it” is a complete transportation policy.

City strategy

Lead with pedestrian safety, then offer staff a usable framework.

The Great Highway conflict is not something to minimize. The serious answer is a corridor-specific safety framework: slow zones, yielding duties, visible accountability, crash reporting, rider outreach, and a private-rider data pilot. The goal is to make fair regulation easier for supervisors than a blanket ban.

Open the San Francisco policy memo

San Francisco pressure points

Crossings

Great Highway and shared corridors

Any public path that mixes pedestrians, strollers, dogs, bikes, scooters, and EUCs needs slower passing, explicit yielding, and visible consequences for hit-and-run behavior.

Trust

The public needs to see accountability

Anonymous high-speed riding near pedestrians is politically fatal. Faster devices need visible ID, liability coverage paths, and clear operating rules.

Data

Do not regulate from one anecdote

San Francisco should collect actual device class, speed context, location, citations, injury severity, infrastructure, and whether existing laws were enforced.

The San Francisco ask

Immediate guidance

No high-speed sidewalks or crowded promenades; slow at crossings; yield to pedestrians; lights after dark; stop after any collision; avoid reckless passing; preserve access while staff evaluates classification.

90-day pilot

Voluntary EUC registry, rider pledge, incident intake, insurance-interest survey, route-risk map, SFMTA/police/rider working group, and annual review before any permanent prohibition.

What a supervisor can do next

Ask staff for classification review

Request a short memo on where EUCs fit under existing city and state micromobility rules, what behavior is already enforceable, and what compliance path responsible riders currently have.

Invite a rider/staff conversation

Before new restrictions are drafted, bring riders, pedestrian advocates, SFMTA staff, and public-safety stakeholders into the same room around concrete operating rules.

Public comment line

“San Francisco can protect pedestrians without banning responsible EUC riders. Please require slow zones, yielding, lighting, visible accountability, and incident reporting, then create a lawful compliance path for private riders before adopting any blanket restriction.”